Yesterday when I suggested that all the arrows pointed to this unfortunate reality, I had a gut feeling the disinformation agent who menaces me on Facebook would have to do her job and jump on this. Not only did this happen but this time she came with a friend.
I’m just asking the public to think about it for themselves. It’s the reaction and the patterns that show the truth. I’ve been watching that there is a concerted effort by a team of publicists currently working gatekeeping this concept. All in unison, they are saying nonono, the Hapsburgs would never kill this boy. Add that to the pile of circumstantial evidence that they did kill this boy.
The post in question is here.
The memoirs that just scream that they more than likely did kill this boy is here. (Why was it so important to remove this boy from his mother in order for her to get her nice big place with her new lover in Italy? Why was it so important to remove this unfortunate boy from his governess - the only person who was ever like a real mother to him - apart from his father?)
I’m not telling people what to think. I’m just saying what I think and I’m asking people to consider the evidence and then I’m asking for them to think for themselves. Try something like that and there they are - the gatekeepers trying to imprint information that is more than likely untrue - in my opinion.
The reaction only shows there’s a concerted effort here. This boy died in a palace with no oversight. All we can look at is the preponderance of the evidence. It would be ridiculous to think all these people of today would just be so sure that the Hapsburgs and their friends wouldn’t do this. The Hapsburgs thought nothing about putting Marie Louise in a sham marriage in bad faith to destroy Napoleon - yet they grew all these scruples after that? Not likely.
All I’m asking is that you listen to these memoirs and that you decide for yourself and please keep in mind that a team of publicists are out there telling you what you should think.
I’ve been writing about this reality concerning the death of Napoleon’s son for months. While this poor boy is long gone, the publicity effort concerning his demise is alive and well.
Any concept with its own publicity team guarding it is more than likely a lie. My goal here is to show people how very easy it is to see the truth for themselves. The reaction validates what’s already so obvious. The congruent story is true.
My real goal here is to show the world of sneaky publicists leaving comments all over trying to trick people into thinking there’s a consensus on certain subjects when that is simply not true. Look at how much money is being spent to spin the Napoleon story away from assigning blame to the appropriate parties.
We can argue about Napoleon’s son’s death in perpetuity and it will get us nowhere. Then, forget that, take a look at the behavior of the Hapsburgs on matters where there are no disputes. A clear picture does indeed emerge. The argument is a distraction from the dismal facts that can’t be disputed. Once a person can spot a sneaky publicist, then getting tricked happens a lot less.
